Cutis Medical Laser’s Weblog

The closer you look, the better we look

Archive for December 2008

Cutis Hair Removal Special

with one comment

Please forward this special to your friends so that they can enjoy it as well - we really appreciate it.

 

We are starting the New Year with a great special to get you all ready for the next summer. Hair removal is among the most popular aesthetic treatments – for both men and women (although on different areas).

Hair removal usually requires about 5 treatments as the laser or light can only target hair that is in the growth stage (Anagen Stage)  and at any given time only about 1/3 (depending on age and location of hair) is in that stage. 

Cutis Hair Removal Special (for a series of 5 treatments)

  • Underarm: $1,300 ($260/treatment vs. $405 for single treatment)
  • Bikini: $1,300 ($1260/treatment vs $405 for single treatment)
  • Back – Partial: $1,500 ($300/treatment vs. $480 for single treatment)
  • Lower Legs: $2,500 ($500/treatment vs. $810 for single treatment)
  • Full Legs: $3,800 ($760/treatment vs. $1,200 for single treatment)

Our Cutera CoolGlide was the first 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser cleared by the US FDA to permanently reduce hair in patients of all skin types (I-VI), those who are tanned or tanning and patients who suffer from Psuedo-Folliculitis Barbae (PFB).

Advantages of CoolGlide CV Laser Technology

 1064 nm wavelength with the 10 mm spot size provides the penetration depth to reach the hair bulb and bulge targets.

Large 10 mm spot size is ideal for large or small areas.

Pulse durations are long enough to spare the epidermis but short enough to efficiently heat the hair.

 Unique and proprietary power supply allows optimization of pulse width, fluence and repetition rate across the full parameter range. Other 1064 nm lasers sacrifice one of these parameters, limiting clinical efficacy or speed. 

Gold-plated copper cooling offers more than ten times the thermal conductivity of the sapphire windows (most common method of cooling), thereby providing the most efficient method of removing heat from the skin.

*6 and 12 months 0% interest free installment plans available

*Valid from January 1st 2009 to January 31st 2009

Written by cutislaser

December 31, 2008 at 3:43 pm

Patient feedback

without comments

I always appreciate feedback from my patients and usually don’t publish it here on my blog – but this one really touched me. Thank you R.

 

Hi, Dr. Ramirez.  I’ve been in xxxx for the past few months, and am immersed in the job hunt!  There are certain aspects of my experience in Singapore that are deeply engraved in my mind, though. One of these is your tremendous kindness, Dr. Ramirez. You were an angelic presence in my life at a really difficult time, and I thank you for that. All the best to you!
 
Affectionately,
R

Written by cutislaser

December 31, 2008 at 3:00 pm

Posted in General

Tagged with

Cosmetic science ‘not respected by academia

without comments

This interesting article appeared in cosmeticsdesign.com and states that cosmetic scientics – and practitioners by association – lack respect in the scientific communicty. As a scientist (please see my scientific publications in www.cutislaser.com) I have my own view but would like to hear from you.

 

Cosmetic science and the accompanying journals suffer from a lack of respect within academia, according to one of the industry’s most distinguished scientists.

Cosmetic science and the accompanying journals suffer from a lack of respect within academia, according to one of the industry’s most distinguished scientists.

Consequently, dedicated cosmetic science courses in educational institutions are lacking and peer-reviewed publications relatively scarce, according to Professor Robert Lochhead.

Lack of peer reviewed publications

However, Lochhead, who is the recipient of the Maison G. DeNavarre medal, one of the highest awards in the Arts and Sciences of Cosmetics, explained that the seeming lack of peer reviewed publications is not due to a lack of rigorous science within the discipline.

Instead, it reflects the multidisciplinary nature of an industry whose innovation is driven largely by market pressures, he told CosmeticsDesign.com.

“Market pressures drive the introduction of new products and that in turn drives the emergence of new science and engineering,” he said.

He compared the situation to other industries such as electronics, stating that under these circumstances intellectual property must be protected and the preferred publications become patents.

In addition, he notes that the interdisciplinary nature of the industry means that such articles are published in disparate publications, and are not grouped together in one place.

“Cosmetic science is essentially multidisciplinary and the scientists who do publish tend to do so in the peer-reviewed journal of their primary discipline rather than in the cosmetics journals,” he said.

Industry pioneers breakthroughs

The industry is not just grounded in rigorous science but is often the pioneer behind breakthroughs that then go on to affect other disciplines.

One example could be the increasing use of nanoparticles in cosmetics products and according to Lochhead, the industry was one of the pioneers of modern nanoscience.

“The industry is underpinned by scientific knowledge of surfaces, colloids, nanoscience, chemistry, biology, biochemistry, anatomy/physiology and physics and it is often the first industry to introduce new concepts that subsequently trickle into larger industries,” he added.

However, it is often for these other disciplines that many of the most successful industry experts are known.

Lochhead himself is, he says, more respected by the ‘high priests of academic science’ for his work in polymer science and engineering than cosmetic science. 

Written by cutislaser

December 29, 2008 at 5:43 pm

Posted in General

Tagged with , ,